Community Empowerment
A few weeks ago, I joined a One Basin CRC panel that focused on empowering local communities, as part of a broader conversation around the review of the Murray-Darling Basin Plan.
What encouraged me about the panel was the clear and genuine appetite for approaches where locals and local knowledge have a stronger place in shaping the outcomes that affect them.
Empowering local communities is easier said than done however, and across the whole Basin, local influence is uneven.
Some places have strong organisations, some have experienced local leadership, and some even have established ways of working together. Others are under-resourced and lack frameworks to engage. Many communities feel over consulted and not heard. They have the experience of being asked to respond to complex issues quickly, without adequate information or support.
That unevenness really does matter. It means you cannot assume stakeholders and communities are coming into decision-making processes with the same resources, the same knowledge, the same confidence, or the same ability to engage on equal terms.
If we want to ensure local voices count, and achieve better outcomes grounded in common understanding and a sense of fairness, it won’t come from simply inviting people to provide feedback into the same old processes.
For me, there are two areas that need much more attention if we are to empower communities and ensure local voices matter.
The first area is our decision processes. Too often, communities are asked what they think and then options or decisions are shaped somewhere else.
Embedding better and fairer decision processes does more than collect input. It gives people a genuine chance to help work through issues, rather than react to a position that is taking, or has already taken shape. It empowers communities by helping people understand what’s at stake, what evidence matters, what constraints exist, and where the real trade-offs sit.
We need decision makers to aim for this and help create the opportunities for communities to bring in their knowledge and perspectives, learn from others and have increased power and influence in these processes. This requires valuing the expertise and knowledge held by communities and providing the support to enable these changes.
The second area is local governance. Good local governance doesn’t make disagreement disappear, but it can give people a better framework for working together and understanding the regional system and perspectives. It can provide a basis for making judgements and problem-solving, together. Stronger ways of working together can help communities shift from siloed advocacy to informing decisions and arriving at solutions.
It’s now common to hear people talk about community empowerment and bottom-up approaches in water decision-making. That’s positive, but there’s still a real gap in enacting these better, fairer processes.
These considerations have to shape the practical questions we ask ourselves and our communities. Who gets recognised? Who has influence? What evidence will count? How will we make trade-offs visible? How will decisions be explained? How will people see how a conclusion was reached, even if they don’t fully agree with it?
These are the issues that go to the heart of whether a process feels credible. And this is where Watertrust is making a genuinely useful contribution.
Want to know more? Call Chris: 0429 990 604
Read our newsletter here or join our mailing list now to stay up to date with the latest news from Watertrust Australia.